Making of a mammoth tragedy
Manmohan Singh
Manmohan Singh
The decision to demonetise will cause grievous injury to the honest Indian who
earns wages in cash. The dishonest black money hoarder will get away with a mere
rap on the knuckles
It is said that“money is an idea that inspires confidence”. At the stroke of the midnight hour,
on November 9, 2016, the confidence of more than a billion Indians was destroyed. Prime
Minister Narendra Modi had declared that more than 85 per cent of the value of money held
in notes of Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 was worthless overnight. In one impetuous decision, the
Prime Minister has shattered the faith and confidence that hundreds of millions of Indians
had reposed in the Government of India to protect them and their money.
The Prime Ministerin his address to the nation said,“there comes a time in the history of a
country's development when a need is felt for a strong and decisive step,” and propounded
two primary reasons forthis decision. One was to check “enemies from across the border…
using fake currency notes”. The other was to “break the grip of corruption and black money”.
Both these intentions are honourable and deserve to be supported whole-heartedly.
Counterfeit currency and black money are as grave a threat to the idea of India as terrorism
and social division. They deserve to be extinguished using all the firepower at our disposal.
However, the popular saying “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” serves as a
usefulreminder and warning in this context.
The underlying premise behind the decision of the Prime Ministerto render Rs.500 and
Rs.1,000 currencies as illegal overnight seems to be this false notion that ‘all cash is black
money and all black money is in cash’. This is farfrom reality. Let us understand why.
Life thrown into disarray
More than 90 per cent of India’s workforce still earn their wages in cash.
These consist of hundreds of millions of agriculture workers,
construction workers and so on. While the number of bank branches in
rural areas have nearly doubled since 2001, there are still more than 600
million Indians who live in a town or village with no bank. Cash is the
bedrock of the lives of these people. Their daily subsistence depends on
their cash being accepted as a medium of valid currency. They save their
money in cash which, as it grows, is stored in denominations of Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes. To
tarnish these as ‘black money’ and throw the lives of these hundreds of millions of poor
people in disarray is a mammoth tragedy. The vast majority of Indians earn in cash, transact
in cash and save in cash, all legitimately. It is the fundamental duty of a democratically
ALSO READ
Amartya
Sen terms
demonetisation
a despotic
action
12/10/2016 Manmohan Singh on Demonetisation: Making of a mammoth tragedy The Hindu
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/Makingofamammothtragedy/article16779252.ece?homepage=true 4/7
elected government in any sovereign nation to protect the rights and livelihood of its
citizens. The recent decision by the Prime Ministeris a travesty of this fundamental duty.
Black money in India is a genuine concern. This is wealth that has been accumulated over
years by those with unaccounted sources of income. Unlike the poor, holders of black money
have access to various forms of wealth such as land, gold, foreign exchange, etc. There have
been various attempts by many governments in the past decades to recoverthis illicit wealth
through actions by the Income Tax department, the Enforcement Directorate and schemes
such as Voluntary Disclosure. These measures were targeted strikes at only those suspected
to be holders of such unaccounted wealth, not on all citizens. Evidence from these past
attempts has shown that a large majority of this unaccounted wealth is not stored in the
form of cash. All black money is not in cash, only a tiny fraction is. Against this backdrop, the
decision by the Prime Ministeris bound to have obverse implications by causing grievous
injury to the honest Indian who earns his/her wages in cash and a mere rap on the knuckles
to the dishonest black money hoarder. To make it worse, the government has actually made
it easierto generate such unaccounted wealth in the future by the introduction of a Rs.2,000
note. This brazen policy measure has neithertackled the stock of black money holistically
nor has it stemmed the flow of it.
It is no surprise that the logistical challenge ofreplacing billions of old currency notes with
new ones is a monumental one. It is a huge challenge in most nations, and in a country as
vast and diverse as India it was bound to be doubly so. This is also one reason why most
nations that have undertaken such currency swap operations have done so over a certain
time period and not as a sudden overnight operation. It is heartbreaking to see and hear of
millions of poorIndians standing in long lines to withdraw some money for basic
sustenance. As someone who has experienced long lines forrationed food during wartime, I
neverimagined that one day I would find my own countrymen and women waiting endlessly
forrationed money. That all of this suffering is due to one hasty decision makes it even more
disconcerting.
The macroeconomic impact of this decision of the government is likely to be hazardous. At a
time when India’s trade numbers are at multi-yearlows, industrial production is shrinking
and job creation is anaemic, this policy can act as a negative shock to the economy. It is
indeed true that India’s cash to GDP ratio is very high vis-à-vis other nations. But this is also
an indicator of the Indian economy’s dependence on cash. Consumer confidence is an
important economic variable in a nation’s growth prospects. It is now evident that this
sudden overnight ban on currency has dented the confidence of hundreds of millions of
Indian consumers, which can have severe economic ramifications. The scars of an overnight
depletion of the honest wealth of a vast majority of Indians combined with their ordeal of
rationed access to new currency will be too deep to heal quickly. This can have ripple effects
on GDP growth and job creation. It is my humble opinion that we as a nation should brace
ourselves for a tough period overthe coming months, needlessly so.
Unintended consequences
Black money is a menace to our society that we need to eliminate. In doing so, we have to be
mindful of the potential impact on hundreds of millions of other honest citizens. It may be
tempting and self-fulfilling to believe that one has all the solutions and previous
governments were merely lackadaisical in their attempts to curb black money. It is not so.
Leaders and governments have to care fortheir weak and at no point can they abdicate this
responsibility. Most policy decisions carry risks of unintended consequences. It is important
to deftly balance these risks with the potential benefits of such decisions. Waging a war on
black money may sound enticing. But it cannot entail even a single loss of life of an honest
Indian.
Dr. Manmohan Singh was Prime Minister of India from 2004 to 2014.
Courtesy:The Hindu
No comments:
Post a Comment