Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reports. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 March 2017

The ugly truths of manual scavenging

The ugly truths of manual scavenging





Despite technological advancements and increasing sensitivity to human rights, manual scavenging continues in the country, and with it, heart-wrenching death.


Though the jury is out on the origins of this inhuman practice of manual scavenging, the fact remains that it persists to this day despite being prohibited under a clutch of laws.

Courtesy The Hindu

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-ugly-truths-of-manual-scavenging/article17666855.ece?homepage=true



Thursday, 16 March 2017

مرد مومن د زمانہ کے حق میں رحمت اور مظلوموں کا نجات دہندہ ہوتا ہے۔ ایاز الشیخ

 مرد مومن وہی ہے جس نے اپنی خودی کی پوری طرح تربیت و تشکیل کی ہے ۔ 
 مرد مومن د زمانہ کے حق میں رحمت  اور مظلوموں کا نجات دہندہ 
ہوتا ہے۔ ایاز الشیخ

حیدرآباد ۔ ''اقبال کے کلام میں مرد مومن کی صفات اور خصوصیات کو کافی تفصیل سے پیش کیا گیا ہے اور ان صفات کا بار بار تذکر ہ اس صورت سے کیا گیا ہے۔ کہ اس کی شخصیت اور کردار کے تمام پہلو پوری وضاحت سے سامنے آجاتے ہیں ۔ یہ مرد مومن وہی ہے جس نے اپنی خودی کی پوری طرح تربیت و تشکیل کی ہے اور تربیت اور استحکامِ خودی کے تینوں مراحل ضبط نفس، اطاعت الہی،اور نیابت الہی طے کرنے کے بعد اشرف المخلوقات اور خلیفتہ اللہ فی الارض ہونے کا مرتبہ حاصل کر لیا ہے''۔ان خیالات کا اظہار معروف اسلامی اسکالر، جناب ایاز الشیخ، چیرمین امام غزالی ریسرچ فاونڈیشن  وریزیڈنٹ ایڈیٹر یو این این نے 'اقبال کا مرد مومن کون؟ '  کے موضوع پر ، کانفرنس ہال جامع مسجد عالیہ عابڈس میں محفل اقبال شناسی کی ٨٨٩  ویں نشست کو مخاطب کرتے ہوئے کیا۔علامہ اقبال کے منتخب اشعار کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے فاضل مقرر نے کہا کہ ا قبال کا مرد مومن حیات و کائنات کے قوانین کا اسیر نہیں بلکہ حیات و کائنات کو اسیر کرنے والا ہے۔ قرآن مجید نے انسانوں کو تسخیر کائنات کی تعلیم دی ہے اور مرد مومن عناصر فطرت کو قبضے میں لے کر ان کی باگ اپنی مرضی کے مطابق موڑتاہے۔ وہ وقت کا شکار نہیں بلکہ وقت اس کے قبضہ میں ہوتا ہے۔ کافرکا کمال صرف مادہ کی تسخیر ہے لیکن مردمومن مادی تسخیر کو اپنا مقصود قرار نہیں دیتا بلکہ اپنے باطن سے نئے جہانو ں کی تخلیق بھی کرتا ہے۔ وہ زمان و مکان کو اپنے اندر جذب کر لیتا ہے ۔ عرفانِ خودی کے باعث اسے وہ قوت حاصل ہو جاتی ہے جس سے حیات و کائنات کے اسرار و رموز اس پر منکشف ہوتے ہیں اور اس کی ذات جدت و انکشاف اور ایجاد و تسخیر کی آماجگاہ بن جاتی ہے۔ وہ اپنے عمل سے تجدید حیات کرتاہے۔ اس کی تخلیق دوسروں کے لئے شمع ہدایت بنتی ہے۔ایاز الشیخ نے اپنا پر مغز خطاب جاری رکھتے ہوئے کہا کہ ا قبال جسے مستی کردار کہتے ہیں وہ دراصل عمل اور جدوجہد کا دوسر ا نام ہے ان کے ہاں پیہم عمل اور مسلسل جدوجہد کو اسی قدر اہمیت دی گئی ہے کہ مرد مومن کے لئے عمل سے ایک لمحہ کے لئے بھی مفر نہیں۔مردمومن کی ذات میں جمالی اور جلالی دونوں کیفیات بیک وقت موجود ہوتی ہیں ۔ بظاہر یہ کیفیات متضاد نظر آتی ہیں لیکن بباطن یہ ایک دوسرے سے جد ا نہیں اور مرد مومن کی زندگی ان دونوں صفات کی حامل ہوتی ہے ۔ وہ درویشی و سلطانی اور قاہری و دلبری کی صفات کا بیک وقت حامل ہوتا ہے۔ اس کی سیرت میں نرمی اور سختی کا امتزاج ہوتا ہے اور اس کے مضبوط و قوی جسم کے پہلو میں ایک دل درد آشنا ہوتاہے۔جوبے غرض ، بے لوث ، پاک اور نفسانیت سے خالی ہوتا ہے۔ اسی لئے مرد مومن د زمانہ کے حق میںرحمت  اور مظلوموں کا نجات دہندہ ہوتا ہے۔مرد مومن جرات مند ، بے خوف اور حق گو ہوتا ہے ۔ اسے نہ جابر و قاہر انسان خوفزدہ کر سکتے ہیں اور نہ موت اسے ڈرا سکتی ہے۔ وہ ایمان کی قوت سے حق و صداقت کا پرچم بلند کرتا ہے اور شر کی قوتوں کے مقابلہ میں پوری قوت کے ساتھ اس طرح ڈٹ جاتا ہے کہ انہیں پسپا ہونا پڑتا ہے۔ اور پھر معاشرہ اسی نصب العین کی جانب رجوع کرتا ہے۔ جو مرد مومن کا مقصود زندگی ہے۔ اپنے خطاب کے اختتام پر انہوں نے کہا کہ مرد مومن اور سچے مسلمان کے لئے اسلام نے جو معیار مقرر کیا ہے بنیادی طور پر اقبال نے اسی کو اپنا یا ہے۔اگر ہم اس معیار کو اپنا لیں توہمارے ظاہر و باطن میں انقلاب برپا ہو جائیگا اور مظلوم انسانیت امن و سکون سے ہمکنار ہوگی۔
قبل ازیں نشست کا آغاز تلاوت کلام پاک سے ہوا۔ محافل عالیہ کے روح روں جناب غلام یزدانی ایڈوکیٹ نے مقرر اور موضوع کا تعارف کرایا ۔ شہر حیدرآباد و اکناف سے محبان اقبال و علم و ادب کی کثیر تعداد نے شرکت کی ۔دعا پر نشت کا اختتام ہوا۔ اس نشست اور محافل عالیہ کے تمام پروگرامس کی ویڈیو یوٹیوب پر دستیاب ہیں۔ اسکا لنک ہے https://www.youtube.com/user/mahafilealiya










Sunday, 29 January 2017

5,000 sacked for demanding higher wages

5,000 sacked for demanding higher wages: 
The human cost of Bangladesh's $27-billion garment industry

In December, the government responded to a peaceful strike by workers with use of force, legal action and arrests.









Supplanting India, Bangladesh is currently the second largest exporter of readymade garments in the world. This principal source of foreign earning brought in $27 billion in 2016, and the target is to swell that to $50 billion by 2021, the year the country turns 50. A billion dollars for each year of independence lends poetry to capitalism, but fails to account for the true, human cost of production in a country that is the byword for cheap labour. When the demands of workers for respect and higher wages took the shape of peaceful protests in December, the nationwide refusal to entertain these was indicative of the commonplace myopia of the industry having evolved into an endemic blindness about it.

On December 12, workers at various factories in Ashulia, an unplanned industrial zone that has mushroomed in what is considered greater Dhaka, went on strike for a fortnight. The strike action amounted to workers walking out of factories and refusing to work. On the ninth day, 84 factories availed themselves of the provisions of the Labour Act and, terming the actions of the workers illegal, stopped production while pursuing legal action against them. The lifeless structures resumed their soulless existence when they reopened on December 26, Boxing Day.

The resolution, if euphemism can stretch far enough for what happened to be called that, was a unanimous refusal to countenance a wage rise, and 59 factories dismissing up to 5,000 workers. The names of those made redundant were circulated among owners, to prevent them from seeking employment in the industry again, while their numbers were downplayed.

The labour minister was emphatic in his support of the stance taken by the factories, reaffirming that, like the Labour Act, serving the labourers did not fall within his remit. The factory owners and the government were complemented in their efforts by foreign voices espousing the virtues of free market capitalism about a global apparel market valued at over $3 trillion. Centuries ago, these brilliant minds were championing colonialism, to civilise the barbarians of the third world. Capitalism is their cause in the present day. Their deliberate ignorance of how much of that money reaches the workers in a country with one of the lowest minimum wages of the worldwide industry is a reminder of the central flaw of their argument: workers are chattel in a profit-maximising system that eschews egalitarianism for accumulation of wealth at the top. Being humane is a needless inconvenience, if not an outright weakness, in this environment.

In addition to demanding an end to harassment and oppression in the workplace – more widespread than the middle and upper classes of Bangladesh are willing to acknowledge – the workers wanted the minimum wage of Tk (Bangladeshi taka) 5,300 (approximately Rs 4,500) to be raised three-fold. Given that the current rate is less than one-fifth of the living wage – the minimum income required to meet one’s basic needs – and that inflation has held at over 5% since the last wage rise in 2013, this is not an unreasonable demand.

Big Garments and politics
The government responded by deploying the police, the elite Rapid Action Battalion and paramilitary law enforcers Border Guard Bangladesh during the strike, to bring the situation under control. Containment measures included the use of riot gear, batons and rubber bullets, and scores of arrests. Dozens of labour organisers were forced into hiding. Nazmul Huda, a journalist covering the strike, was accused of disseminating false news and arrested. He was linked to the ruling Awami League’s political opponent, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, some of whose leaders were blamed for inciting the protests. The home minister warned people against conspiring against the industry, a shining symbol of Bangladesh’s heralded development, and in so doing, successfully branded legitimate concerns and protests as political subversion in a country that does not tolerate dissent. Media coverage switched from diligent reporting of the strike action, that came close to giving the workers a voice, to dedicated and nationalistic advocacy of the industry.

Big Garments is not close to governments past and present, it is the government. It has cut out the middleman and the need to lobby. Regardless of who is in power, three quarters of any Parliament benefit directly from it, and are involved with the industry. State response to labour unrest has, thus, always been unequivocally in favour of the owners.

The year 2016 solidified the normalisation of fundamentalism, and saw the worst single terror attack – when five militants murdered 20 hostages at the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka on July 1 – but garment exports rose 9%. Earlier, 2015 saw the extremism tide rise with targeted killings of free thinkers, and the election of one of the most prominent garments businessmen, Annisul Huq, as mayor of Dhaka after controversial mayoral elections whose validity remain contentious.

The industry thrived during the Bangladesh Nationalist Party-Jamaat-e-Islami tenure (2001-2006), when state patronage of terrorist outfits was de rigueur, and the civil society-backed oppressive military regime that followed. It survived the carnage of 2013 when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party-Jamaat-e-Islami brazenly equated violence with politics, and killed and injured thousands of innocent citizens in the name of political protest in a country that is desensitised to death and destruction. That was also the year in which the collapse of the Rana Plaza building in the outskirts of Dhaka caused the worst industrial disaster in Bangladesh, killing 1,135 workers. Nevertheless, the industry has sustained its growth during the increasingly authoritarian rule of Awami League.

Workers undervalued
Resilience, women’s empowerment and development constitute the public face of Big Garments, vaunted by civil society. While it is true that the millions of workers, the majority of whom are women, have employment and a measure of financial security because of the industry, for the Bangladeshi economy to function, these people would have had to be put to work somehow. The duopoly of readymade garments and migrant labour have trapped the lower classes to lives of indentured servitude with an exceptionally low ceiling. Despite both industries being labour-intensive to the point of being entirely dependent on people, workers are grossly undervalued by the state and its citizens. Other countries have used the rag trade as a stepping stone to industrialisation and more sophisticated industries, but Bangladesh’s desperate goal to become a middle-income country by 2021 is married to this low-skilled industry, with neither the country nor its captains of industry inclined towards innovation or evolution.

There are conscientious owners who add value to their businesses by ensuring the social and economic welfare of their workers, and some who are philanthropic. However, their numbers are few, and their efforts are focused on their companies, without altering the conventions of the industry. The owners delusional enough to proclaim themselves activists plead the pressure put on them by brands and buyers threatening to take their business elsewhere, instead of standing up for the workers. There is truth to the disproportionality and abuse of power in the buyer-owner dynamic, but if the comparative powerlessness of owners is accepted as an incontrovertible truth, then it is equally indisputable that workers dare not even aspire to being powerless.

The majority of workers make the minimum wage. This was raised to Tk 1,672.5 in 2006, and to Tk 3,000 in 2010. On both occasions, labour protests demanding a tripling of the minimum wage preceded the reluctant increase that less than doubled it. The most recent raise, to the current Tk 5,300, came in the wake of the Rana Plaza tragedy. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s denials in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in the aftermath notwithstanding, Towhid Jung Murad, an Awami League member of Parliament, manufactured the authorisation for Sohel Rana, owner of the Rana Plaza and an Awami League cadre, to illegally build the eight-storeyed structure on land of questionable provenance. The commercial property was not purpose-built for factories, yet housed a few separate ones. This is not uncommon. They made clothes for several well-known high street brands from the United Stated and the United Kingdom, yet were not directly contracted to undertake the production by the said brands. Nor is this uncommon.

Big brands unconcerned
Therein lies the dirty little secret of the global apparel market: brands do not concern themselves with how or where their clothes are made, so long as they are made cheaply and delivered on time. When something goes wrong, as it catastrophically did at Rana Plaza, they plead ignorance and innocence, as they have done in continuing to neglect their commitments towards compensating the victims and survivors. The disaster did not ebb the strong growth of the industry in Bangladesh, despite the glaring administrative failures that led to it.

Bangladesh has over 5,000 factories that employ over five million people, and a history of deplorable practices, including oppression and appalling wages. This year will mark the fifth anniversary of the Tazreen factory fire that killed at least 117 and injured over 200, a precursor of the Rana Plaza disaster. Both were instances of corporate manslaughter on a large scale, whose culprits were not only specific locals and foreigners, but an entire obscurantist, exploitative industry.

The victims and survivors still await justice and compensation. Their fellow workers await dignity, and the right to unite and be heard in the land of the deaf. The success of the readymade garments export industry is the tale of a capitalist dystopia. That brands, buyers and factory owners celebrate this as axiomatic, but the rest of the country and, as an active participant in the global rag trade, the world should be outraged. Instead, they choose to be complicit.

Ikhtisad Ahmed is a columnist for the Dhaka Tribune and author of the socio-political short story collection Yours, Etcetera. His Twitter handle is @ikhtisad.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

Credits: scroll.in

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

France prosecuting citizens for 'crimes of solidarity'

France prosecuting citizens for 'crimes of solidarity'
by: Kyle G Brown

French citizens are facing prosecution and even jail time for helping refugees and migrants.












Houssam El Assimi was arrested during a police raid on a Paris camp and was charged with 'violence against persons holding public authority' [Remi Mazet/Al Jazeera]

Paris, France - Trying to ward off the overnight cold with a blanket donated by volunteers, Muktar Ali was sleeping rough in the north of Paris when at about 4:30am, the police returned. He and several other Eritreans say they were pushed, prodded and kicked by police clearing the area.


"Police took everything I had - clothes, shoes, blanket - and threw it all away," said Ali, 33, who had fled forced conscription in Eritrea and was held captive by rebels in Libya before crossing the Mediterranean Sea to Europe. Now, he's among many refugees living on the streets of Paris, who have been subjected to displacement, detention and deportations.

Police raids, at least 30 since last June, and a cycle in which displaced people return to live in squalid camps, have angered residents and prompted them to form groups like Le Collectif La Chapelle Debout, which provide food and shelter that they say the government should be providing.

But recently, as a result of these actions, these activists have been finding themselves in criminal courts across France. 

Houssam El Assimi, of Chapelle Debout, was arrested during a police raid on a Paris camp last September. Charged with "violence against persons holding public authority," he faces up to three years in prison and €45,000 (over $48,000) in fines.

Last week, his trial was adjourned until May. In the meantime, he plans to file charges against the police for using excessive force during his arrest. 

He has been translating French and Arabic and helping migrants navigate the French immigration system and told Al Jazeera that he is being targeted because his group protests against the police and government policy.

El Assimi is one of several people pursued in the courts for protesting on behalf of migrants and asylum seekers or providing them with transport and shelter.

Under Article L622-1 of France's immigration law, anyone who "facilitates or attempts to facilitate the illegal entry, movement or residence of a foreigner in France shall be punished by imprisonment for five years and a fine of €30,000 (over $32,000)".

Crime of solidarity

Pierre Mannoni, a 45-year-old geography professor and father of two, was arrested at a highway toll booth while driving three injured Eritrean teenage girls to Nice for medical care. He was acquitted in court, thanks to another clause stipulating that one must benefit from the transaction - a clear reference to human trafficking. But the prosecution has appealed and called for a six-month prison term.

Often referred to as the "crime of solidarity", the law has been used to prosecute people who support  migrants and asylum seekers.

Rights group Gisti has documented a rise in the number of such cases going to court, and more than 100 NGOs, charities and labour unions signed a manifesto this month calling for an end to the criminalisation of humanitarian activity.

"What we're seeing is that all of the cases have one purpose," Claudia Charles, a legal expert at Gisti, told Al Jazeera. "That's to discourage any kind of support for the foreign population, be they migrants, Roma or asylum seekers."

Originally aimed at smugglers in 1945, the law was sometimes used under former President Nicolas Sarkozy's administration to prosecute those who helped immigrants.

In 2012, the new Socialist government vowed to turn the page. "Our law cannot punish those who, in good faith, want to give a helping hand," said Manuel Valls, then France's interior minister.

Human rights groups accuse the government of betraying its word and say an ever-widening range of laws are now being used to criminalise people for helping new arrivals, from the charge of assault to defamation and "insulting a public official."

"Since 2015, there's been a proliferation of cases aimed at intimidating or preventing citizens from expressing solidarity with migrants, refugees and Roma," says Marine De Hass, of the rights group, La Cimade. "It's not just article 622-1. A growing number of people are being prosecuted for helping or supporting, undocumented persons," De Hass told Al Jazeera.

Local Green councillor Jean-Luc Munro described a personal incident that took place as he was riding his bike in a Roma camp near Lille last April.

He said he was thrown off his bike after being told to stop by the police at a roadblock there, and was consequently charged with using his bicycle as a weapon to inflict "violence against a public official".

"There's been a real hardening against activists for a year and a half now," Munro told a local newspaper.

Having documented only a handful of cases against activists between 2012 and 2015, Gisti lists more than a dozen in 2016 alone, with several more going to court in the coming months.

The list is not exhaustive: both Charles and De Hass say there are probably more, unknown, cases.

Bruno Le Roux, the French interior minister, told Al Jazeera, however, that if no one profits from helping refugees and migrants, there is no "crime of solidarity". "So I can tell you that for all the cases being pursued, in court, they're cases where we believe there is a violation of the law." 

The ministry has not responded to repeated requests for an explanation as to why cases are being pursued in which no personal gain is apparent. Although the Nice courts concluded as much in Mannoni's trial, the prosecution appealed his acquittal.

"It's crazy that we have reached this stage," says Mannoni. "Where I've gone to trial for helping someone who is hurt. The government is criminalising human charity."

Criminalising charity

The government and the city of Paris have set up new reception centres, including one in mid-January, for women and children in Ivry-sur-Seine just south of Paris.

But where shortages persist in the capital, in border towns, and Calais where the "jungle" was dismantled, volunteers are taking matters into their own hands.

No longer able to ignore the refugees and migrants lining the country roads near the Italian border, Cedric Herrou began picking them up and hosting them at his farm in La Roya Valley, near Nice.

As the tents and wooden cabins he built were not enough, he brought travellers to an old SNCF rail building that had been occupied by activists and NGOs, and where Pierre-Alain Mannoni helped three Eritrean teens.

With reinforced security at the border, following last July's massacre in Nice, asylum seekers have had difficulty getting through, and arrive in the area hungry and exhausted. 

"I picked up kids who tried to cross the border 12 times," Herrou said at his trial earlier this month, where he was convicted of facilitating the entry, movement and residence of undocumented foreigners. "There were four deaths on the highway. My inaction and my silence would make me an accomplice, I do not want to be an accomplice."

Awaiting his sentence, Herrou was arrested again on January 18 on fresh charges.

His van has been confiscated and he says he'd been followed and is under surveillance. It has had little effect on the 37-year-old farmer, who smiles broadly in photos, surrounded by kids from Sudan and Eritrea.

"Whatever happens, I'll continue," he said before his second arrest. 

"It's astonishing that human smugglers continue to pass through, the real smugglers who get rich on the backs of others, while humanitarians are harassed in this way," Herrou's lawyer, Me Zia Oloumi, told Al Jazeera by phone.

"The authorities can't control the borders so they're putting pressure on people in the valley to discourage them from supporting migrants, by detaining people and putting them on trial."

The divisive issue

The humanitarian crisis on Europe's doorstep and resulting influx of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, have divided the country, and few places encapsulate the dilemma better than La Roya Valley - a rugged, mountainous crossroads taken by asylum seekers bent on heading north, undetected. 

In December, a local rights group, Roya Citoyenne, filed a formal complaint, accusing the authorities of failing to honour their obligation to look after unaccompanied child refugees, saying on their website that "these minors are suffering intensely and risk death on the roads".

The next day, Eric Ciotti, president of Alpes-Maritimes Department, denounced "a handful of activists …blinded by a far-left ideology," for organising the "clandestine entry of foreigners across the French-Italian border".

Then, he assailed Herrou, whose rescue efforts and indifference to prosecution have made him a local hero and the bane of local police. 

"Who can say with certainty that of the hundreds of migrants that Mr Herrou has proudly brought across the border," Ciotti wrote, "there isn't hidden among them, a future terrorist?"

Similar divisions are playing out in the national arena, during the run-up to the presidential elections in April and May. 

Protests have erupted both in defence of migrant rights, but also, in some towns, against the opening of new shelters for asylum seekers.

While some candidates on the left say France should do more to welcome refugees and unaccompanied minors, the far right says the country is already doing too much. 

Despite taking just a fraction of the numbers being welcomed by Germany, conservative frontrunner Francois Fillon says France cannot afford to take in any more asylum seekers than it already is.

Those who resist the hard line on immigration feel they are being worn down in the courts.

"They're trying to ruin us financially because it costs a lot to prepare for trial," El Assimi said at the Paris high court. He estimates he's spent more than 5,000 euros (over $5,300) in legal costs so far.

"Their strategy is to exhaust us. And it's working." 

Source: Al Jazeera



The tragedy of Egypt's stolen revolution

The tragedy of Egypt's stolen revolution

byAmr Hamzawy
Senior Associate, Middle East Programme, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Six years on, Egypt's new authoritarianism has utilised various tactics, including repression and judicial manipulation.












Egypt's new authoritarianism undermines stability and security [Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Reuters]


Six year after its democratic revolution in January 25, 2011, Egypt's political realities are back to square one. Once again, a military officer has been installed in the presidential palace after an election that lacked any measure of democratic competition.

Images of citizens waiting in long queues to cast their votes in parliamentary and presidential elections in 2011 and 2012 have been replaced with ugly scenes of police units rounding up young Egyptians after attempted peaceful demonstrations and with confirmed reports of torture in places of custody and forced disappearances.

Although this authoritarianism is not the country's first contemporary encounter with undemocratic rule, the fact that it has emerged after a brief democratic opening and a period of citizens' activism has meant that the ruling military junta, in their quest for power, has resorted to unprecedented aggressions on human rights and freedoms and on the fragile social fabric. As a result, the state apparatus has lost all the checks and balances between an overly dominant military-security complex and its weakened civilian components.

To this end, Egypt's new authoritarianism has used various tactics and tools, ranging from outright repression to undemocratic law-making and judicial manipulation.

Soon after the 2013 military coup, daily bouts of violence and human rights abuses sponsored by the state had begun to shake Egyptian society and challenge the generals' claim that their rule was to save the most populous Middle Eastern country from the outbreak of civil strife.

"Repression has allowed the ruling junta to induce fear among citizens, to subdue civil society dissent and to eliminate competitive politics through human rights abuses".

Repression has been the major structuring reality of Egypt since 2013.

But it is not the only tool the new authoritarianism is using.

According to various human rights organisations, the number of those imprisoned between 2013 and 2017 has reached approximately 60,000. To accommodate them, the Egyptian authorities have begun building 10 additional prisons.

Reports of forced disappearances documented by local and international human rights organisations put the rate of disappearance at an average of three to four cases a day. There were mass killings when army and security forces disbanded the sit-ins organised by the Muslim Brotherhood supporters in al-Nahda and Rabaa on August 14, 2013.

Local human rights organisations reported 326 cases of extra judicial killings in 2015, a number which rose to 754 cases in the first half of 2016 alone. In August 2016, the Egyptian Coordination of Rights and Freedoms released a report on prison conditions in Egypt, documenting 1,344 incidents of torture - including direct torture and intentional medical neglect - in detention facilities and prisons between 2015 and 2016.

Several international human rights organisations have confirmed the same shocking findings.

Repression has allowed the ruling junta to induce fear among citizens, to subdue civil society dissent and to eliminate competitive politics.

The eventual goal is to abrogate the freedom of expression and association.

A few years into Egypt's new authoritarianism, citizens have been herded away from the public space that has been shrinking thanks to government's crackdown on independent civil society organisations and opposition political parties.

Meanwhile, Egypt's ruling elite has failed to deliver on the promises made as they stalled the democratic opening and asserted control over state and society.

President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the army chief during the 2013 coup, initially portrayed his ascendency to power as the only way to end the threat of terrorism blamed on the ousted President Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Backed by the military establishment, Sisi presented himself as the ultimate guarantor of restoring stability and improving the living conditions of the majority. It was within this context that wide segments of the population, especially those opposed to the democratic opening, supported the coup and saw in Sisi a saviour in uniform.

Although the generals have continued to repeat these promises over the past years, the situation on the ground has deteriorated drastically. The threat of terrorism, predominantly in Sinai - and to a lesser extent on the mainland -  has not diminished. 

The continuation of terrorist attacks since 2013, as well as the involvement of the military and security forces in indiscriminate killings and other human rights abuses in Sinai, are forcing many Egyptians to question whether the government's "war of terror" is being pursued efficiently.

The implementation of forced evacuation policies targeting some local communities in Sinai, along with dramatically deteriorated living conditions, have created an environment informed by grievances and radicalisation.

On the other hand, the country's economic and social conditions have worsened. The government has been pursuing a reform programme endorsed by the International Monetary Fund. It is designed to address structural issues such as the huge budget deficit, official overspending, state subsidies and currency floatation.

However, this long-term programme is not expected to improve the economic conditions in the near future, nor lessen the social suffering resulting from high poverty rates [27.8 percent] and unemployment rate [12.6 percent] in 2016.

Indeed, the IMF-approved programme has hit the poor and needy segments of the population, as well as the middle classes, hard as inflation rates have soared - reaching 25 percent in December 2016 and January 2017. The currency has been massively devaluated, losing close to 50 percent of its previous value.

Adding to this economic malaise, the financial support which Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have extended to the government since the 2013 coup, has been declining since 2015.

Due to such instability in the security and political situation, western investment has not significantly increased.

Many of the government's economic, social, and developmental policies have proved unsuccessful as well. These policies include investing public resources in funding mega building projects with uncertain returns and without any public scrutiny or oversight.

Also problematic is the fact that projects such as the Second Suez Channel and the New Administrative Capital are managed directly by the economic arm of the military establishment, which is not subjected to effective transparency and accountability measures originating from other official institutions or from civil society.

Only a few programmes implemented to help the poor - most notably the cash payment programme named Takaful wa Karama - Solidarity and Dignity - which the Ministry of Social Solidarity oversees, have been rated successful by independent sources.

Egypt's new authoritarianism cannot rely on the promise of restoring security and improving the living conditions of the majority to justify to the public its elimination of the democratic opening that preceded it and its heavy-handed ruling techniques.

Therefore, it has depended on a web of alternative narratives to justify its repression through security-controlled  media institutions, which include conspiracy theories, defamation campaigns and hate speech against voices of dissent.

Since 2013, the list of public enemies and conspirators has been expanding in the discourse of the security-controlled public and private media outlets. Besides the Muslim Brotherhood and oppositional Salafi movements that were classified as "enemies of the nation" from the outset of the coup, the list also includes human rights activists and pro-democracy civil society leaders who have condemned the government's repression and refused to remain silent in face of terrifying abuses.

The list has come to include groups of young Egyptians, students, industrial workers and civil servants whose peaceful activism has not diminished despite police brutality and other repressive measures.

These groups, labelled by Sisi as "people of evil", have been implicated by the government in alleged plots and conspiracies to undermine the nation’s stability, to impose chaos and to fragment the state and the army.

Against a background of growing economic and social crises, rising political tensions and failed policies, the use of both religious and nationalistic populism has become key strategies utilised by the new authoritarianism to maintain its control over Egypt.

Religious populism elevates the ruler to the level of a moral paragon, who has the right to speak in the name of religion. Nationalistic populism, on the other hand, is used to justify the generals' monopoly on power.

The government's readiness to utilise conspiracy theories, defamation, hate speech and populism to justify repression, has made it easier for the military establishment to systematically violate citizens' rights and to disregard the principles of the rule of law without fearing accountability.

It has also enabled the government to widen the scale of repression aimed at silencing the few voices of dissent that have emerged in the public space since the 2013 coup, and at constricting the pro-democracy mobilisation of students, youth, workers and civil servants.

Within the apparatus of the Egyptian state, it has also led to the predominance of the military establishment and the security and intelligence services, that is to the predominance of those institutions that have the power to unleash the use of excessive force on citizens and society.

This has greatly diminished any potential for civilian politics or for the balancing civil-military relations in post-2013 coup Egypt.

Finally, unlike the unfounded accusations levelled against human rights activists and pro-democracy groups that they have been out to impose chaos in Egypt since 2011, it is the new authoritarianism that, due to continuous abuses and violations, undermines stability and security.

Source: Al Jazeera




Monday, 2 January 2017

This New Year's Eve Bengaluru Turned Into A City Of Horrors For Women

This New Year's Eve Bengaluru Turned Into A City Of Horrors For Women

Shocking beyond words.

Bengaluru seems to be stealing Delhi's thunder when it comes to women's safety. Rather, it is catching up with the reputation of the so-called crime capital of India in this area of civic life.

On New Year's Eve, as the rest of the country was busy celebrating ushering in 2017, the residents of Bengaluru went out of gear in their revelry. In fact, their actions crossed way beyond the line of civility and became a major liability for a section of the population as well as the custodians of law and order.

A detailed report in Bangalore Mirror painted a shocking picture of what exactly unfolded on the last night of 2016. According to eye-witness testimonies as well as information available from other sources, hundreds set out on a spree of inebriated merry-making in prime parts of the city, such as Brigade Road and MG Road. Although the police made close to 500 arrests for drunken driving, the situation on the ground seemed much worse. For women, especially, it proved to be a night of horrors.

Across the city, women who had gone out on their own or accompanied by friends and family complained of being accosted, teased, molested, harassed and persecuted. Photographic evidence showed women on the run, pursued by groups of men, or seeking help from police personnel, as a rowdy mob rolled on the streets in a drunken stupor or drove around recklessly.

Although the police tried to underplay the extent of the disruption by citing the number of complaints it had received and comparing it with other years, the threat was palpable and has sullied the reputation of a city that was once considered several notches safer than Mumbai and Delhi.

Additional director general of police Praveen Sood, who assumed charge as the police commissioner of Bengaluru on 1 January, said the safety of women, children and senior citizens were his main priorities. "What is the point of calling ourselves a civilised society if our women and children do not feel safe?" he said in another interview with Bangalore Mirror.

Bengaluru has seen a rise in incidents of crime against women over the last year. In December, a lawyer, Jyothi Kumari, was allegedly killed by a stalker, B Madhu, who had been pursuing her for four years. The 27-year-old woman had complained against her harasser, after he had allegedly assaulted her once and stolen her scooter, but he was let off by the police with a "stern warning", without even taking down a first-information report.

Complaints of crimes against women have largely fallen on deaf ears, with the police even saying, days before the mayhem of the night of 31 December, that it was not possible for them to patrol every inch of the city and that the onus of safety equally lies with women.

With more a proactive police chief and persistent protests from civil society, the protectors of law will hopefully resolve to be more vigilant in this area of civic life.

Courtesy: Huffington Post


Thursday, 29 December 2016

اقبال امت مسلمہ کو حوصلہ دیتے، امید کی جوت جگاتے اور روشن مستقبل کا مژدہ سناتے ہیں ۔ ایاز الشیخ

اقبال امت مسلمہ کو حوصلہ دیتے، امید کی جوت جگاتے اور روشن مستقبل کا مژدہ سناتے ہیں ۔ ایاز الشیخ



حیدرآباد (یو این این)   ''اقبال کی نظر میں انسانیت کا مستقبل مسلمان سے وابستہ ہے۔ ان کے نزدیک مسلمان اس گلستان (دنیا )کا بلبل ہے۔ اس کا گیت گلستان کے لیے بادِبہاری کا حکم رکھتا ہے۔ وہ بلبل کو گیت کی لے بلند کرنے اور پرجوش آواز میں گیت گانے کے لیے اکساتے ہیں ۔ ان کے نزدیک مسلمان کے لیے محض نام کا مسلمان ہونا کوئی قابلِ لحاظ بات نہیں آخرت میں قسمت کا فیصلہ عمل و کردار سے ہوگا''۔  ان خیالات کا اظہار معروف صحافی و دانشور، جناب ایاز الشیخ، چیرمین امام غزالی ریسرچ فاونڈیشن نے 'اقبال کی نظم طلوع اسلام ۔ ایک تجزیاتی مطالعہ '  کے موضوع پر ، کانفرنس ہال جامع مسجد عالیہ عابڈس میں محفل اقبال شناسی کی ٨٧٧  ویں نشست کو مخاطب کرتے ہوئے کیا۔  انہوں نے کہا کہ اس نظم کا شمار بھی علامہ اقبال کی چند بہترین نظموں میں سے ہوتا ہے۔ اس نظم کو علامہ اقبال نے انجمن حمایت اسلام کے سالانہ جلسے میں اپریل ١٩٢٣ میں پہلی بار پڑھ کر سنایا تھا۔یہ وہ زمانہ تھا کہ جب ترکوں کو ہر طرف سے دشمنوں نے گھیر رکھا تھا، یونانیوں نے سمرنا پر قبضہ کر کے ترکوں کا قتل عام کیا، جس سے ترکوں میں جذبات بھڑک گئے، جس کا نتیجہ یہ نکلا کہ  میںترکوں نے غاصبوں کے خلاف جہاد کا آغاز کیا اور ان تمام علاقوں پر دوبارہ قبضہ کیا جو یونانیوں کے قبضہ میں چلے گئے تھے خاص کر سمرنا پر دوبارہ قبضہ اس جنگ کی سب سے بڑی فتح تھی۔ اور اس جنگ میں یونانیوں کی تین لاکھ فوج کو شرمناک شکست سے دوچار ہونا پڑا۔ ترکوں کی اس فتح نے علامہ اقبال پر بھی گہرے اثرات چھوڑے تھے اور انھوں نے بھی اسی تناظر میں طلوع اسلام کے عنوان سے یہ فکر انگیز نظم لکھی ۔ یہ نظم علامہ اقبال کے خیالات کی بلند پروازی کی شہکار ہے۔نظم میں کل نو بند ہیں ۔ نظم کے مطالب و مباحث کو ان عنوانات کے تحت تقسیم کیا جاسکتا ہے:۔ جہانِ نوکی نوید' کائنات میں مقامِِ مسلم '  مسلمان کا کردار اور اس کی خصوصیات '  جنگِ عظیم کے نتائج اور اثرات پر تبصرہ '  مغرب سے مایوسی'  انسانیت کا مستقبل: مسلمان ۔ روشن مستقبل ۔

انہوںنے مزید کہا کہ علامہ اقبال کے مطابق اگرچہ امت ِ خلیل اللہ زمانے میں رسوا ہوچکی ہے لیکن اب ا س دریا سے تابدار موتی پیدا ہوں گے کیونکہ امت  آہِ سحر گاہی کی حقیقت سے آگاہ ہو چکی ہے۔ مسلمانوں کا مستقبل بہت تابناک ہے ۔  باہمی اختلافات کے  بھیانک نتائج سامنے آنے پر ملت ِ اسلامیہ کے دل میں اتحاد و اتفاق کی اہمیت کا احساس پیدا ہو رہا ہے۔ شاخِ ہاشمی سے پھوٹنے والے نئے برگ و بار اسی احساس کا سرچشمہ ہیں۔ شاعر نے مسلمانوں کو جہانِ نو کی نوید سنائی لیکن وہ جہا نِ نو کی منزل تک تبھی پہنچیں گے جب جہد و عمل کے راستے پر ان کا سفر مسلسل جاری رہے گا۔ اقبال امت مسلمہ کو حوصلہ دیتے، امید کی جوت جگاتے اور روشن مستقبل کا مژدہ سناتے ہیں کہ مسلمانوں کے دل میں  چراغِ آرزو روشن ہو جائے اور ملت اسلامیہ کا ایک ایک فرد حصولِ مقصداور غلبہ حق کی خاطر سر بکف میدانِ میں نکل آئے۔اللہ انہیں پھرسے سربلند فرمائے گا منصب خلافت و امارت پر فائز کریگا۔ لیکن مسلمانوں کو اپنے عمل و کردار کے ذریعے خود کو اس منصب کا اہل ثابت کرنا ہوگا۔ بنیادی طور پر دنیا کی امامت کے لیے صداقت عدالت اور شجاعت کی تین خصوصیات ضروری ہیں۔ مسلمانوں کو اپنے کردار میں زورِحیدر  فقرِ بوذر اور صدقِ سلمانی  پیدا کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔ دورِ حاضر کے فتنوں سے نبرد آزما ہونے اور دنیا میں ظلم و استبداد اور چنگیزیت کی بیخ کنی کے لیے سیرتِ فولاد کا ہونا ضروری ہے جو صرف انھی صفات کے ذریعے پیدا ہو سکتی ہے۔

ایاز الشیخ نے نظم طلوع اسلام کے متعلق اپنا پر مغز خطاب جاری رکھتے ہوئے کہا کہ یہ نظم بانگِ دار کی طویل نظموں میں اس اعتبار سے منفر د ہے کہ اس میں اقبال کے افکار زیادہ پختہ اور خوب صورت انداز میں سامنے آئے ہیں ۔ فنی اعتبار سے دیکھا جائے تو اس کے بعض حصے نہایت سادہ اور عام فہم ہیں اور بعض حصے بے حد بلیغ اور گہرے مفاہیم و معانی کے حامل ہیں۔ شارح اقبالیات پروفیسر یوسف سلیم چشتی فرماتے ہیں کہ  بندش اور ترکیب،مضمون آفرینی اور بلند پروازی، رمزو کنایہ کی پریشانی اور مشکل پسندی، شوکتِ الفاظ اور فلسفہ طرازی غرضیکہ صوری اور معنوی محاسنِ شعری کے اعتبار سے یہ نظم بانگ درا کی تمام نظموں پر فوقیت رکھتی ہے۔ اقبال کی شاعری کا نقش میرے دل پر اسی نظم کے مطالعہ سے مرتسم ہوا ۔  اپنے خطاب کے آختتام پرفاضل مقرر نے کہا کہ یہ نظم آج بھی امت مسلمہ کو حوصلہ دیتی ہے، امید کی جوت جگادیتی ہے اور روشن مستقبل کا مژدہ سنادیتی ہے اور یہی چیز اس نظم میں عصری معنویت کو ثابت کرتی ہے۔ اور بالکل تازہ نظر آتی ہے۔

قبل ازیں نشست کا آغاز تلاوت کلام پاک سے ہوا۔ محافل عالیہ کے روح روں جناب غلام یزدانی ایڈوکیٹ نے مقرر اور موضوع کا تعارف کرایا ۔ شہر حیدرآباد و اکناف سے محبان اقبال و علم و ادب کی کثیر تعداد نے شرکت کی ۔دعا پر نشت کا اختتام ہوا۔ 

Thursday, 22 December 2016

The Biggest Tech Controversies Of 2016

Exploding Phones, Racist Bots and Clueless Hackers: The Biggest Tech Controversies Of 2016

Tech fiascos that hogged the headlines.

Ivan Mehta  
Tech News Editor, Huffington Post

The year 2016 saw the launch of great tech products, ranging from Google Pixel and Snapchat Spectacles to Mircosoft Surface Studio. The year also had its share of controversies. Here are some of the most interesting ones.

1. Free Basics v TRAI
Last year, when the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had asked for recommendations and views on differential pricing, Facebook went all out to save its ambitious Free Basics program. Under the initiative, Facebook had tied up with select network providers to let people access some websites for free.

2. Freedom 251
In mid-February this year, it was reported that an Indian company named Ringing Bells was going to launch a smartphone that would cost a mere ₹500. Then, days later, Ringing Bells announced that the smartphone, named Freedom 251, would be launched at an unbelievable price of ₹251.

While people were wondering how a smartphone could be sold this cheaply, controversies began erupting around Freedom 251 from 17 February, the day it was launched. Right away some reporters found that the paint was coming off from the review units. The chipped paint revealed that the name of the phone manufacturer was Adcom.

The Ringing Bells website, where one could pay for and order the phone, was also riddled with security holes. The website's servers were down within hours after the sale started. Meanwhile, despite the phone-makers' attempts to tom tom their initiative as part of the government's Make In India scheme, the government distanced itself from the venture and a BJP MP filed a complaint against the owners for misusing the Tricolour.

Late in June, the company announced that it is going to start delivering Freedom 251 devices from July. It hosted an event, announcing plans to make new phones, LCD TVs and also to begin the delivery of Freedom 251. While Ringing Bells claimed that some phones had already been delivered, there was no real evidence of that having happened. The most recent reports suggest that the company has shut down.

3. Microsoft's Tay bot turns racist
Microsoft introduced their AI bot named Tay on 23 March on Twitter and people started to throw all kinds of questions at it. While it was all fun and games initially, the bot turned racist pretty soon, learning from users' responses.

4. Facebook director Marc Andreeson's controversial tweet about India
Commenting on the strong opposition in India to the Free Basics program, Marc Andreessen, Facebook Director and co-founder of the venture capital firm Andreeson-Horowitz, tweeted in February that India's anti-colonial stance had been "economically catastrophic" for it. Naturally, this didn't go too well for him and Benedict Evans who had taken his side on Twitter.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg also slammed the tweet. Andreessen apologised later on the micro-blogging network.

5. The decline and crash of Galaxy Note7
Samsung was sitting pretty in the driver's seat, thanks to its successful flagship Galaxy S7, and the Note7 was poised to become one the best phones of the year. And, reports started to emerge of Note 7 phones catching fire while being charged. There was some suspicion that this might be occurring due to the use of substandard charging accessories not supplied by Samsung, but more reported incidents confirmed that that was not the case.

On 2 September Samsung announced a soft recall of Note 7, saying that it will replace the old and faulty phones with new ones. But this step proved to be inadequate. New instances of exploding phones were reported, some quite serious in nature including that of a jeep catching fire and a man getting burnt.

Samsung issued another notice to users on 10 September but still stopped short of asking users to stop using their Note7s altogether. On 15 September, Samsung finally officially recalled all the Galaxy Note7 units it had sold. The notice was first issued in the US, followed by other countries. But even the new units began exploding. So on 10 October the company finally shut down production.

6. The Legion Attacks
The notorious and foulmouthed hacking group Legion surfaced after it hacked the Twitter account of Rahul Gandhi on 30 November. The very next day, the Indian National Congress party's account was hacked. The next target was business baron Vijay Mallya. Legion even posted a dump of Mallya's personal data including emails and property listings.

Then the group targeted popular journalists Barkha Dutt and Ravish Kumar. Soon Legion members started giving interviews listing their ambitions and sounding quite clueless.

Credit: Huffington Post India




Wednesday, 21 December 2016

From Brexit to demonetisation: 2016 as the year of extremes

From Brexit to demonetisation: 2016 as the year of extremes



Here is a list of events which show that 2016 was a year of extremes

The year 2016 saw a bitter US presidential election, the Syrian civil war taking a bloody turn in Aleppo and the demonetisation scheme announced by the Narendra Modi government. While it is the time to look forward and see what the new year has in store for us, it is also the time to look back and see what the world went through in the last 365 days.

Brexit
The whole world watched in anticipation as Britain voted to leave the European Union. The Brexit decision, a shorthand for Britain and exit, was sealed after the country voted on June 23. In the referendum, 52 per cent voted for leave, while 48 per cent voted for remain. A total of 30 million people cast their ballot.

The immediate impact was such that the world markets saw major fluctuations as the results were being announced. What turned out to be more fascinating was the voting demographics. Reportedly, more young voters preferred remain, while the elderly voted for leave, highlighting a divide which some termed to be unfair for the coming generation of Britain. Following the results, David Cameroon resigned as Prime Minister of Britain and Theresa May took over. She has said that she will trigger the process of leaving EU by the end of March 2017.

Turkey coup attempt
On the intervening night of July 15 and 16, people in Turkey witnessed sudden terrifying chaos as a faction of the military tried to overthrow the elected government in an attempt to seize power from Presidnet Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Overnight, the rebels announced that it had imposed curfew and martial law and that the preparation for a new constitution had begun. Meanwhile, President Erdogan urged his supporters to take to the streets to protest against the military crackdown. The coup, which needed support from public and other factions of the army, failed as majority decided to throw their weight behind the President.

Terror attacks
With the advent of ISIS or ISIL, the middle-eastern region has seen some of the deadliest terror attacks so far. However, 2016 also saw the spread of these terror acts throughout the world with a new technique called ‘lone wolf attacks’ being adopted. The US witnessed the deadliest terror attack since 9/11 as a gunman opened fire in an Orlando nightclub killing 49 and injuring over 50. Apart from that, coordinated attacks took place in Brussels in March killing 32 civilians and 86 were killed in Nice, France during Bastille Day celebrations on July 14. Over 100 such incidents were reported across the world in 2016 including suicide bombings in neighboring Pakistan in March, 2016 in which 75 people were killed. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj also raised the issue of global terror threat at UN General Assembly in September.

The Aleppo offensive
Aleppo, one of the oldest cities in the world located in Syria, has been a battlefront between the rebels and Bashar-al Assad’s forces as both of them try to overpower each other. The civil war in Syria has so far caused thousands of deaths and forced civilians to flee the region. The horrors for around 320,000 civilians trapped in Aleppo continued with the Assad regime carrying out a siege with help from Iran and Russia blocking essential supplies into the city.
The Aleppo offensive launched in late September by Syrian forces was met by another offensive in late October by the rebel forces in an attempt to establish a new line of supply. The people of Aleppo, in order to draw attention to their sufferings, took to social media in December sharing goodbye messages amid reports of torture, execution and rape by the military.

US elections and rise of Donald Trump
Many believed US elections hit a new low as Donald Trump, during his campaign for the post of president, openly advocated banning of Muslims and spoke against other minority groups. The vote count on November 9 and the result came as a shock to many as Donald Trump managed to win the elections. However, his rival Hillary Clinton bagged more popular votes. Trump’s victory did not bode well for many as protests broke out in different parts of the country with the dissenters chanting ‘not my President’.

Kashmir unrest
The killing of Hizbul Mujahideen militant Burhan Wani on July 8 pushed the Valley into an abyss leading to a series of clashes in which dozens of Kashmiri protesters lost their lives and thousands were injured, some blinded by the pellet guns used by forces. On the other hand, the security forces also suffered heavy injuries inflicted by stone pelters. Kashmir unrest, this year, stretched for the longest time period with curfew bringing the Valley to a standstill. Schools and public offices remained closed and basic supplies were hit.

India-Pakistan relations
In 2016, with Kashmir unrest at its peak, the relation between India and Pakistan hit a new low as a series of terror attacks targeted Indian security forces by militants coming from Pakistan. In a retaliatory step, Indian forces conducted surgical strikes along the Line of Control on September 29 destroying the terrorist launch pads operating within Pakistani territory.

Pollution and smog
Several parts of north India, including the national capital Delhi, woke up to a thick smog cover on October 31. The unprecedented smog cover, which did not fade away for coming days, alarmed everyone and brought to everyone’s attention the hazardous levels of pollution.
The level of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in several parts of New Delhi reached 10 to 15 times more than normal levels. The National Green Tribunal rapped the state and Central governments for showing laxity in dealing with the problem which was directly related to people’s health. The situation also triggered a debate regarding different measures that need to be adopted to control the emission of pollutants in the air.

Demonetisation
Perhaps the biggest shock that struck Indian people and impacted the entire population of the country was the sudden announcement of demonetising Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8. The move, according the government, was aimed to counter the problem of black money hoarded in the form of cash and counterfeit currency used to fund terror groups.

However, within days of the announcement, long queues outside ATM kiosks and banks for withdrawing cash and exchange of notes showed that the fight against black money was not going to be easy for the common man. Opposition parties came together and launched protests against the government inside and outside Parliament criticising it for the ‘lack of preparation’ and ‘poor implementation’ of the scheme. Some even went on to call it the ‘biggest scam of the year’. The government, however, maintained that the results of demonetisation will start reflecting in the long term.

Courtesy: Indian Express
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/from-brexit-to-demonetisation-2016-as-the-year-of-extremes-4438413/

Friday, 16 December 2016

Private higher education is burgeoning in India – but millions can't afford it

Private higher education is burgeoning in India – but millions can't afford it

About 44.81 million students aged between 18 and 24 in India do not have the money for further education, a study shows.

As many as 44.81 million – 16.6% male and 9.5% female – Indian undergraduate students aged between 18 and 24 are too poor to pursue higher education, according to data from the National Sample Survey, 2014.
























Source: National Sample Survey report, 2014; figures in percentage

As many as 34.2 million students were enrolled in institutions of higher education in 2014-15, according to the 2016 All India Survey on Higher Education report of the ministry of human resources and development.


Nearly 22 million students (65%) are enrolled in private institutions in various courses.



























Source: * 12th Five Year Plan , # All India Survey on Higher Education 2014-15 report ; figures in percentage

Private sector accounts for more than 76% of total institutions of higher education, data from the All India Survey on Higher Education 2014-15 report shows.

There are 712 central and state universities, 36,671 colleges and about 11,445 standalone diploma-level institutions across the country.

While government-owned institutions for higher education increased from 11,239 in 2006-07 to 16,768 in 2011-12 (49%), private sector institutions recorded a 63% growth in the same period from 29,384 in 2006-07 to 46,430 in 2011-12, according to the 12th five-year plan document of the erstwhile Planning Commission.

The first decade of the 21st century witnessed expansion of higher educational institutions, according to this mission document of the National Higher Education Mission (known as Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan or RUSA), a programme run by the University Grants Commission.

Forced to enroll in private institutions

Around 53% college students are enrolled in private institutions because there are not enough public higher educational institutions, according to the 2014 NSS report we previously quoted.























Source: National Sample Survey Report, 2014; figures in percentage

Students have also been drawn to short-term diploma and certificate courses because of their employability prospect. Secondly, there is huge shortage of public institutions offering such courses, data shows.

Nearly 64% students enrolled for diploma and certificate courses in private institutions would rather be in government-run institutions, according to the NSS report.

So, while there is high demand for public higher educational institutions, successive governments have failed to meet the demand, pushing students towards expensive and, very often, low quality private education.

Commodification of education and exclusion

Private (out-of-pocket) expenditure on education for general courses has increased from Rs 2,461 per student in 2007-08 to Rs 6,788 per student in 2014 (175.8% increase), according to the two NSS reports on education published in 2007-08 and 2014.


















Source: National Sample Survey report, 2014

The TSR Subramanian Committee report on New Education Policy, submitted in 2016, admitted that uncontrolled privatisation of higher education has resulted in the proliferation of private institutions for higher education.

Most of these institutions are nothing more than shops selling degrees, according to the report. “While there are a few (institutions) which can be identified as ‘Centres of Excellence’, both in the public and private sectors, there are a large number which are mediocre, some of them could well be described as ‘degree shops’.”

Fees at private institutions are more than double those charged by government institutions, according to the NSS report.

Private institutions keep the cost of education high, despite restrictions on generating profit.

Ernst and Young, a global auditing and consulting agency, estimated that the market of Indian higher education is worth around Rs 46,000 crore and is expanding by 18% annually, Mint reported on September 10, 2013.










































Source: National Sample Survey report, 2014

The private sector accounts for around 74% of enrolment in technical and professional courses because it has market demand, according to the NSS report. Yet, it shares only 39% of enrolment in general under-graduate and postgraduate courses.

Hurdles in increasing enrolment
Low gross enrolment ratio (GER or percentage of potential students enrolled in educational institutions in a given year) in higher education has been a concern in India compared to other emerging economies in the world.

The GER of higher education has increased from 10% in 2004 to 23.6% in 2014, according to human resources ministry data. Despite the increase, India’s GER (23.6%) is the lowest among major emerging economies such as Brazil (46%), China (30%), Russia (78%) and South Africa (20%), according to World Bank data.

This GER in higher education is less compared to the number of students completing their school education (higher secondary) in the age group of 14-17 years. The GER of students in the age group 16-17 year was 49.1% in 2014, according to human resources ministry data.

So, more than half the students aged between 16 and 17 years did not enroll for higher education after completing schooling.

Successive governments have argued that allowing private sector in higher education would lead to higher enrolment. It was with this objective that both state and centre governments allowed expansion of private educational institutions in the last 10 years.

While it is true that GER in higher education has recorded growth during this period, the increased cost of higher education due to privatisation has deprived millions of aspirants from education.

High level of GER in higher education has direct co-relation with public financing, according to the mission document of RUSA.

Higher per capita expenditure on higher education in some states has resulted in better GER. For example, the per capita expenditure of Goa is Rs. 14,634 and the GER is 33.2%. Similarly, the GER of Tripura is 32.9% with Rs 13,104 per capita expenses. The GER of Andhra Pradesh is 28.4% with per capita expenditure Rs 5,892, according the mission document of RUSA.

Global experience also suggests that higher public investment in education yields positive results, according to the mission document of RUSA.

This article first appeared on Indiaspend, a data-driven and public-interest journalism non-profit.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

Credit. Scroll.in